Project Keep Placement Stabilization Research Paper

Journalism Code of Ethics

A large number of columnists all over world deliberately grasp the writer code of morals as a basic arrangement of qualities and rules required to be an expert and ethically upstanding writer. The Society of Journalists (SPJ) says that â€Å"the code isn't expected as a lot of ‘rules’ however as an asset for moral choice making†. Since it isn't legitimately upheld, it is up to the respectability of the writer to maintain the code of morals. It is beyond the realm of imagination to expect to guarantee that all writers comply with the code of ethics.There will be a few, who couldn't remain by their codes, qualities and honesty when they are notwithstanding monetary and social weights, and decide to step the hazy areas. Individuals don't turn out to be terrible writers in a day. It’s a moderate blur when high contrast is gone to dark. We should be mindful so as not to part with ourselves to untrustworthy acts, and dismissal our ethics so as to get a decent sto ry or some physical prizes. In Singapore, we are honored to have great, moral columnists, who present straightforward news.The same can't be said for some writers in different pieces of the world. Breslin’s (1997) study found the accompanying: In Japan, writers deliberately and normally abridge their fact telling through the act of self-oversight †not from compulsion by the legislature, yet by their own press associations that spread government. In the People's Republic of China, writers †like every single basic specialist †are in the utilize of government and give proper respect to reality, however place a lower an incentive on seeking after with any forcefulness or perseverance.In Korea, columnists frequently perceive truth as the expression of government, and recognize themselves with the first class administering powers and distinguish their job as assisting with guaranteeing agreement between the rulers and the dominated. Their closeness to government is r egularly estimated by the measure of money in the â€Å"white envelopes† they get from their sources. Writers can't live in the mists, doing what they believe is directly without pressures being put on them. Frequently, writers face pressure from an assortment of sources, all attempting to cause the columnist to act in a manner which isn't the manner in which the writer would choose.Journalists are defective and error prone. In any case, we should endeavor to oppose the weights and stand firm. Thusly, it is imperative to survey the present news coverage code of morals, and see if it is as yet significant and adequate. To be sure, the code of morals ought to reflect qualities, difficulties and real factors of news coverage. In any case, â€Å"too a considerable lot of them are for the most part arrangements of do’s and don’ts (typically more don’ts), as opposed to supportive advisers for settling on moral choices in circumstances that aren’t as str aightforward as the approaches here and there make them† (Buttry, 2010).Also, with a significant part of the articles and stories done on computerized social stages, the present news-casting code of morals is inadequate with regards to rules on the utilization of internet based life. The news-casting code of morals endeavors to coordinate columnists from troublesome circumstances however as the maxim goes; it is more difficult than one might expect. The situations depicted are excessively obscure and ridiculous. A columnist may end up in different circumstances where the code of morals neglects to address. All things considered, the code of morals is lacking. I would suggest a report on the code of morals with new standards to turn out to be progressively relevant to present day journalism.When utilizing online life as a stage for a story, know about the gathering who may be distorted on the grounds that they don't utilize internet based life as regularly. For the segment feat ured securing wellsprings of data; if a columnist guarantees a source that he would keep the informant’s character a mystery, he should hold his statement under all conditions. I might want to include, don't distribute basic assessments from individuals looking for classification. The intentions of sources ought to consistently be addressed. Individuals who wish to communicate closely-held convictions in the media ought to consistently remain behind their feeling. Objectivity and fairness.A writer should consistently be target when he composes a story. I might want to include, hold a receptive outlook to all perspectives, even perspectives that we are awkward with. It is as a general rule, harder to compose equitably if the subject intrigue or disturb us. Assume men like Hitler and Osama canister loaded whom many consider to be abhorrent, are as yet living among us today. Also, assume an update comes in and says that Hitler is currently affirmed dead! Or on the other hand Osa ma receptacle loaded effectively released another significant fear follow up on honest residents. But, the columnist must abstain from cheering or moaning in nauseate and report fairly.Also, writers ought to be reasonable for all sources. Official and informal sources can both be of equivalent legitimacy. The line between financial weight and helping out can be fairly meager now and again. A similar situation expressed in the investigation manage; on the off chance that you work for a little league paper, which is in money related troubles, you may be asked by a publicist to compose an article for a specific item, organization or even an individual as an end-result of purchasing promoting space in your paper. It will be against the uprightness of the columnist to laud said item, organization or individual on the off chance that he doesn't put stock in them.He would be respecting financial weight on the off chance that he consents. Be that as it may, if a similar writer regards the i tem, organization or individual to be satisfactory to him and people in general and in this manner consents to help the promoter out, is it still against journalistic morals? All things considered, I would propose another standard; a columnist while in full information that the item, organization or individual is of next to zero advantage to the general population, should never advance or expound well on that item, organization or individual, to be better than it is. Acknowledgment of endowments is denied. A writer ought not request installment in real money or in kind for journalistic work.And he can't acknowledge them either, regardless of whether they come without request. This is important to guarantee decency and validity. In any case, the code of morals offers no guide with respect to how a writer ought to give to help a reason or a political gathering. A columnist is as yet an individual with rights, and his activity doesn't make him any to a lesser extent a resident of a maj ority rule society. Alluding to the disputable issue where Keith Olbermann gave $7200 of his own cash to three up-and-comers pursuing open position. The occurrence brought about the excusal of Keith Olbermann from MSNBC.Greener (2010), posted: â€Å"Who among us needs to get their boss' authorization before making an open and lawful political gift? † The code of morals doesn't address how writers may give, just on what we can or can't get. It is reasonable, that the very idea of the activity sees any gifts by a columnist to be an inclination towards the association. In this manner the requirement for more straightforwardness. I would propose another standard: A writer may contribute uninhibitedly to any admirable mission, as long as he does it straightforwardly and express the subtleties on any articles identified with the topic.What should a columnist do if he somehow happened to begin an individual blog? In this new advanced age, the code of morals isn't adequate in coverin g the region of computerized internet based life. Do similar guidelines apply as though the columnist was composing for an official paper? Would he be able to have the right to speak freely of discourse in his own blog? Or then again is he despite everything considered responsible for each word. This new standard ought to be presented: A columnist may post openly on his own blog. In any case, because of the idea of his activity, he ought not remark on any subjects he examined on his official medium, so he doesn't bargain his expert integrity.A columnist ought to be answerable for whatever he composes. The reason for announcing unbiasedly and decently is to guarantee as meager individuals as conceivable get injured or influenced by what we compose. All things considered, it is inescapable that individuals can get affronted now and then. In this way, a writer must concede botches and right them openly. Print isn't the main stage for columnists. Different mediums incorporate photograph y, video, realistic craftsmanship plans, sound and so on. Because of the various strategies for correspondence, more principles and rules are required.A absence of expertise or information about various media ought not be a reason for a slip by in morals. All in all, a writer is considered responsible to his own trustworthiness and ethics. The reporting code of morals is simply a rule, for columnist to consider when they chance upon circumstances in their expert work. Reporting isn't as straightforward a vocation as what the overall population thinks. Much is expected of a columnist; duty, obligation, empathy, a curious brain. These are only the start of the numerous characteristics a decent columnist requires.Of course, one can't turn into a decent writer short-term. An expert writer is based on certainty obtained through understanding, by conquering snags and clutching morals. References Brislin, T. (Walk 6-8, 1994). A report on news coverage morals in Asia: Values and practices a s setting for importance in Japan, China and Korea. In Jounalism Ethics in Asia. Recovered November 19, 2012, from http://www2. hawaii. edu/~tbrislin/asiaeth. html. Buttry, S. (November 7, 2010). Columnist's code of morals: time for an update?.In The Buttry Diary. Recovered November 19, 2012, from http://stevebuttry. wordpress. com/2010/11/07/writers code-of-morals time-for-an-update/. Greener, R. (November 5, 2010). Keith Olbermann suspended by MSNBC: Like ‘Louie† †I'm stunned! . In The Huffington Post. Recovered November 19, 2012, from http://www. huffingtonpost. com/richard-greener/keith-olbermann-suspended_b_779736. html. SPJ Code of morals. (1996-2012). In Society of Professional Journalists. Recovered November 19, 2012, from http://www. spj. organization/ethicscode. asp.

13 Reasons Why Examining media representations of mental illness

13 Reasons Why Examining media representations of mental illness 13 Reasons Why: Examining media representations of mental illness 13 Reasons Why Examining media representations of mental illness 13 Reasons Why: Examining media representations of mental illness

How Did Thomas Malthus Inspire Charles Darwin s Theory Of...

Introduction to Biological Anthropology Exam 1 Name: Sean Cook Short Answer: Answer each question in a few sentences, as specifically as possible. Remember to use appropriate terminology and answer all parts of the question. (5pts each) 1. How did Thomas Malthus inspire Charles Darwin’s theory of natural selection? Define natural selection. Thomas Malthus stated that the human population would eventually decrease significantly. His reasoning was that there would be a scarcity of food and other vital resources, leaving only the fittest of the species to survive. These â€Å"fittest† of the species would then pass on their traits to their offspring. Darwin used this is a firm foundation for his natural selection theory. Natural selection is the idea that the organisms that are the best suited for the environments they live in, are able to survive and pass on their genetic traits with huge success to the next generations of said organism. 2. What’s the difference between a stem cell and a differentiated cell? Give an example. Why are stem cells important in science? The difference between stem cells and a differentiated cell is the fact that stem cells have the ability to become any kind of cell once they are more developed. Differentiated cells already have a purpose set for them and will fulfill that one purpose once they have developed and matured fully. Stem cells are basically cells that haven’t differentiated yet. Stem cells are important to science because of theirShow MoreRelatedTransforming Species Into Molecular Biology3591 Words   |  15 Pagesradically changed through means of breakthrough theories, ideas and experimentations from scientists exploring the realms outside of the traditional religious views. The method of how science was conducted drastically altered as well. The development of new technologies allowed scientists to step away from simple observation, towards more sophisticated and complex research. Through those influential hundred years, one question remained, what is life? And how do we appropriately chara cterize it? Because

Peer Review And Writing Style Essay - 875 Words

When Research, Peer Review and Writing Style Meet Bringing new evidence based practice to the bedside involves a multi-faceted approach involving research, peer review, and publication of new ideas. Research is necessary for the discovery of scientific advancement. Peer review is necessary to ensure the integrity of research findings prior to publication. Adherence to writing principles and style are necessary to convey research findings vetted by peer review. Poorly written research findings remain undiscovered due to lack of clarity and ease of reading. Conversely, well-written research articles in peer-reviewed nursing journals often lead to change in bedside practice. Research A Nursing 2016 research article by Briggs, Hawrylack and Mooney (2016) cite peppermint oil helps control nausea in post-operative patients. The study targets post cardiac surgery patients. Briggs et al. (2016) first conducted a literature review to determine the effectiveness of previously conducted aromatherapy studies on post-op nausea and vomiting. Results indicated that aromatherapy alleviated nausea. Gaps found in literature review prompted a new research study utilizing cotton wicks saturated with three drops of essential peppermint oil to assess the degree of nausea control. 34 of the 132 participants enrolled in the study developed post-op nausea and utilized the peppermint oil inhaler. 27 of 34 subjects reported total or partial relief of nausea post inhaler; five of the sevenShow MoreRelatedComm 215 Syllabus Essay1466 Words   |  6 Pages |Essentials of College Writing | Copyright  © 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005, 2004 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved. Course Description This course covers the essential writing skills required for college-level coursework. Students will learn to distinguish between interpretive and analytical writing while using the writing process and specific rhetorical strategies to develop position andRead MoreMy Writing For Writing A Writing Intensive Course1228 Words   |  5 PagesThere were goals in English 109M that lets me know that I will learn in the class to help prepare me for the writing intensive course. These goals, let me know what the expectation is for the class and how these goals will help me to improve my writing proficiency in the writing intensive course. However, it was not an easy journey for me. I did have my struggles with writing essay for this class due to insufficient of English grammar rules but I manage to do better than I thought. My essays mightRead MoreStudy Guide1489 Words   |  6 PagesCOURSE SUMMARY COURSE DESCRIPTION This course examines phases of the writing process, with emphasis on the structure of writing and techniques for communicating clearly, precisely and persuasively. MAJOR INSTRUCTIONAL AREAS 1. Writing Process A. Paragraph and essay structure and function B. C. Reflection and prewriting Outlining D. Audience and purpose E. F. Evaluation techniques—self-review and peer review Self and peer editing and proofreading symbols G. Transition and flow H. OrganizationRead MoreBeing A Foreigner Speaking English As A Second Language1040 Words   |  5 Pagessecond language, writing is something that always gets across in any of the classes. Due to the fact that the organization of the sentence structure in English and Korean are so different, I tend to make mistakes on the overall organization of the essay. Even though you know how to speak the language, writing a paper with right form of sentences in different than just speaking. Still now, I get tripped over with grammatical errors and transitions of the organizations. But doing peer review sheets on otherRead MoreWriting an Academic Essay1224 Words   |  5 PagesAcademic writing is different from other forms of writing; it is distinctive, clear and concise. This essay will describe the factors that contribute to the credibility of an academic piece of writing, and incorporating them effectively into your own writing. In this essay I will further discuss t he following three features to enrich credible academic writing; planning and drafting, critical writing and referencing and plagiarism. With an abundant quantity of literature available, it is importantRead MorePersonal Reflection1353 Words   |  6 Pageshave learned a lot of things this year, as well as being refreshed with things that I obviously struggled with. This course developed me into a better writer; educated me on how to begin the writing process, taught me a lot of different essay styles, and showed me the importance of receiving peer and external review. Ever since the first essay was assigned to us, I have become a better writer. Some of the common mistakes that I made in the first essay were: comma splices, run-ons, made paragraphs toRead MoreWhat I Learned At The English 110 Essay1125 Words   |  5 PagesEnglish 110 I endured a writing style of APA that was barely introduced to me in high school. The most beneficial things I learned throughout my research process this year is the use of the writing center and librarians , the online databases, and the moodle forum post allowed me not only to succeed in English 110, but will give me beneficial techniques to use in future papers I will have to write. After receiving the prompt for a reflective research essay three, I began my writing process in a normalRead MoreRandomised Controlled Trials Essay1652 Words   |  7 Pagesscientific community shares with the pharmaceutical industry that typically funds RCTs. The dissemination of RCTs results may be done by publishing articles in an unbiased, accurate and timely manner in peer-reviewed biomedical journals (Dowsett, 2010). Publication of clinical trial data in peer-reviewed journals represents the leading channel by which important scientific findings are communicated to the medical and scientific community, and subsequently to the public (Dowsett, 2010). In other wordsRead MoreThe Apa Style Of Writing Has Been In Existence For Over1433 Words   |  6 PagesThe APA style of writing has been in existence for over 80 years and has been revised 6 times over that time period. APA has been recognized as a guide for many important disciplines beyond Psychology including business and education which indicates the standards credibility in the publishing community (Hunsley, 2010). The long tradition of the APA standard establishes the credibility and importance. It has evolved to keep up with modern research and technology. Using the same style as othersRead MoreMid-Self Evaluation Essay886 Words   |  4 PagesMid-Self Evaluation Essay As this semester has begun, and I have begun to adjust to this course’s requirements, expectations, and goals I have found myself taking more risks and challenging my prior writing style. I’ve been a little apprehensive with my writing style this semester and feel that at times I may be missing the entire ideas of the topic. Although I do the work and get a good grade, I always feel uncertain before posting a blog or turning in my final assignment. Although the entire

How Useful Are Sources A to C To Explain Why The United States Became Involved In The War In Vietnam Free Essays

Sources A-C gives us some insight into why the USA fought and got involved in Vietnam and reveals a number of reasons about Vietnam. I shall be reviewing each source from which I have stated above. Sources A, B and C. We will write a custom essay sample on How Useful Are Sources A to C To Explain Why The United States Became Involved In The War In Vietnam? or any similar topic only for you Order Now Source A is a primary public speech made by President Johnson (Lyndon Baines Johnson) in April 1965 just one month after the start of ‘Operation Rolling Thunder’ helping to stop communism according to the provenance. In the speech Johnson is stating in the source, I quote â€Å"We fight in Vietnam because we have a promise to keep†. By this statement indeed Johnson did want his opinions to be heard and notified by his fellow American citizens, so they shall believe every word that comes out of Johnson’s mouth. This was due to a promise being made by President Eisenhower when he was elected president in the year of 1953. Lyndon Johnson wishes all the Americans to trust in what he is saying to be 100% truthful and is trying to carry on regarding the promise made by Eisenhower and earn everyone’s respect. The ‘Truman Doctrine’ was also mentioned about. This is a list of every American President who had been elected in year 1948 to agree with a various amount of promises which they written then had to sign. Truman Doctrine was a promise they were fighting for â€Å"promised to help when there are any threats of communism†. So Johnson decided he wanted to do the same thing, so he signed and agreed once president. In the year of 1954, President Eisenhower and JFK started transporting â€Å"advisers† as the first president Kennedy would have wanted. From the tone of Johnson’s words in the speech, you can tell he jus maybe talking in a religious manner and might even be a religious person within the speech. President Lyndon Johnson wants to reassure every single American citizen about the â€Å"Domino Theory†. This was a theory of a mid-20th century foreign policy theory. The title ‘Domino’ is given to this theory because it can end up like a stack of dominos. This is because if you let one country fall to communism then each over country around that county would then soon follow falling one to another and become communism itself and Johnson was petrified of this happening. Lyndon Johnson is trying to make everyone go and fight in the Vietnam War. As most of the American citizens believed this is what would eventually happen if just one country did fall to communism and it’s why Johnson is trying to justify himself. In the year of 1945 nearly all of all the American leaders all offered to help and give their own support of the Vietnam War. President Eisenhower was a well respected and great general of the war. There was one thing which was expected to be achieved or aimed said by President Johnson in the speech, I quote â€Å"the independence of the South and the freedom of the people of South Vietnam to guide their own country in their own way’. The Americans also think that they’re available to strengthen â€Å"world order† because the U.S.A as democratic wanting to stop communism. Although there were two countries that relied on the Americans if they were at any point attacked which were ‘Thailand’ and ‘Berlin’. If Vietnam was left to fight for itself, then it would increasingly look terrible on some of the promises which the Americans agreed with, due to American’s believing it was their duty and their own right to fight for Vietnam. Johnson implied, I quote â€Å"to leave Vietnam to its fate would shake the value of an American commitment and in the value of America’s word. The result would be instability and unrest, and even wider war†. I could say this source is being very biased, due to because Johnson is only giving his own opinion on what the American citizens want to hear, whilst he is keeping his real thoughts inside and not expressing his personal opinions. The source can be seen quite useful, but has limitations, as I have stated, it’s a public speech where Johnson isn’t really voicing his truths about what he thinks of Vietnam. To look at Johnson’s person views, then I can begin to study source B. Source B is a private primary speech made by President Johnson in May 1964 according to the provenance. At this point in time, Lyndon Baines Johnson was only just elected president. With Johnson being V.P. (Vice President) he knew a lot regarding Vietnam and knew how everything worked. Lyndon Johnson became the thirty-seventh Vice President in the years from and to 1963-1965. Johnson was one of the major leaders of the ‘Democratic Party’. Also Lyndon Johnson was the one who were in charge of creating the â€Å"Great Society†. President Lyndon Baines in this private speech is discussing a number of things which includes criticizing most of his very own American citizens. I quote â€Å"I don’t think the people of our country know much about Vietnam, and I think we care a hell of a lot less†. From Johnson stating these words, he is blatantly calling most of the American citizens dumb, thick and lack of knowledge about the Vietnam. With Johnson saying this, he has a very low profile on the American citizens and implies that the U.S.A cannot win the war. In public no-one would use the word â€Å"hell† like Johnson did in the speech, due to it being a southern religious Texan society which always stayed faithful and don’t appreciate foul language such as swearing. Speaking in Private Johnson doesn’t care what he is implying and doesn’t have to bite his tongue to try and stop himself from voicing his very own opinions like he does when speaking out in public. As Johnson knows that none of the American citizens shall hear what he really thinks about them. In this source President Johnson is really voicing his opinions. You know this by Johnson saying, I quote â€Å"I don’t think we can fight them ten thousand miles away from home, I don’t think it’s worth fighting for. What the hell is Vietnam worth to me?† Johnson is agreeing that the U.S.A need to stand up to communism, as Johnson is terrified of communism. Although, he is trying to get his personal views across which is stating Vietnam is not worth anything at all. It’s like Lyndon Johnson isn’t really concerned and couldn’t care less about his people and about the Vietnam War. It’s showing us that Johnson is scared and has fears of communism taking over the world as states and that the political consideration â€Å"Let’s move on, let’s go into the North† are just being selfish. We have to be very suspicious within this speech, as it hasn’t been edited or tampered with and indeed if it’s all whole trustworthy. Possibly was it taped? As it has been to believed that since President Johnson been president in the white house his office was monitored by everything that had been said by recorders. But is this really reliable and exactly what U.S.A. President Lyndon Baines Johnson really said? As I have stated before it can be edited in various ways making things sound different from what has actually been said, which could make this source a limitation. Source C is a secondary speech of a modern writer interview with Professor Noam Chomsky, an American critic of the war in October 1982 according to the provenance underneath the extract. The interview is talking about political reasons of the U.S.A and how they went to war which was to dominate Vietnam. Also to discontinue South Vietnam from independence and indeed there was an attack on South Vietnam from the U.S.A. Professor Noam Chomsky says, I quote, â€Å"The U.S. did not want an independent South Vietnam that was no longer dominated by America. It feared that South Vietnam might be able to reform and improve itself – develop it’s economy- and that might work†. Chomsky is being biased due to him being an anti-American, and is therefore being biased towards the American country. To sum up the conclusion of sources A-C all have value and limitations. In my view source B is most useful as it’s a private speech where Johnson is criticizing most of his own American citizens by using negative comments and is saying what he really thinks about Vietnam along with the citizens plus America. Once this private speech with Johnson’s personal opinions and views about Vietnam, the tape was then exposed to everyone. Therefore source B is definitely the most useful out of them all. How to cite How Useful Are Sources A to C To Explain Why The United States Became Involved In The War In Vietnam?, Essays

The Basics of Learning to Turn as Relates to Air Combat free essay sample

This will not be a definitive, doctorate level dissertation on the subject. I’ll go over the basics here and hopefully help get you on the right track. This discussion is geared toward the F-16 Fighting Falcon. However the principles discussed are just as valid for any fighter aircraft. First we’ll look at Turn Rate Radius, then corner airspeed and then how to lead turn. Energy Management also plays strongly into turning well. We’ll hit that up at the end of this lesson. Turn Rate: The rate at which an aircraft can turn or rate it’s nose while turning. In other words if you’re pulling a circle, rate is a definition of how fast you get around that circle. Don’t just think of rate in terms of complete circles though. I give that as an example to help you visualize and understand rate. Turn Rate is usually expressed in reference to instantaneous and sustained rates and is measured in degrees a second. We will write a custom essay sample on The Basics of Learning to Turn as Relates to Air Combat or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Instantaneous is exactly what it sounds like†¦. How much rate you can command from an aircraft immediately as you turn. Sustained is the rate you can sustain through a turn. The F-16 has a 26 degree/sec maximum instantaneous turn rate. I havent found reliable figures for the Vipers max sustained turn rate. In the Tac Ref in F4 it states 13 degrees/sec. I promise you I can pull significantly better than that, right around 18 deg/sec. Coincidentally several reputable online sources state 18 deg/sec sustained rate. Of course you’ll need to be at the right airspeed to capture the best rate, both instantaneous and sustained. It’s important to realize that the F-16 is one of the very, very few (in all probability the only operational) aircraft able to pull a sustained 9 G turn. This fact, along with the F-16’s extraordinary sustained turn rate capability, are among the things the Viper is most legendary for. In Falcon 4 we have to deal with the fact that the Viper as modeled cannot perform a sustained 9+ G turn as it can in real life. We’ll work around this as well as the fact that many other aircraft types are actually over modeled. At times throughout this training I’ll point out differences between actual vs. Falcon 4 performance info so that you’ll be knowledgeable on both. Rate is needed to achieve weapons parameters or defeat attacks. The F-16s turn rate increases very rapidly from slow speed up to 330 KCAS, at which point the rate is the highest. Rate allows the attacker to match or exceed the turn rate of his adversary and establish lead for a gunshot. The attacker needs a turn rate advantage that will allow him to pull his nose onto the bandit to employ the AIM-9 or point to lead pursuit for a gun shot. It is important to note an attacker with a higher sustained turn rate can maintain a positional advantage against a defender with a smaller turn radius but reduced rate (Figure 13). For example, in order to employ the AIM-9, you must have a turn rate that will allow you to keep your nose within approximately 30 ° of the bandit for tone acquisition and missile launch. The ability to maintain a high sustained turn rate while the defender sacrifices sustained rate for a tighter turn is another key concept in understanding BFM. In this sense, a turn rate advantage is more tactically significant than a smaller turn radius. Keep in mind an old fighter pilot saying that’s always been very true; â€Å"Rate Kills! † It’s important to note that the F-16 turns better with afterburner (AB). Believe it or not this is not always the â€Å"norm† for most combat aircraft. AB in the Viper gives a better turn capability because it allows the pilot to sustain airspeed and thereby sustain a higher turn rate (assuming near corner velocity). In addition, maneuvering at higher AOA’s results in a greater portion of the aircrafts thrust vector to be pointed toward the center of the turn, which also helps the F-16 maintain a smaller turn radius and greater turn rate. To achieve the highest turn rate possible, slow or accelerate towards corner velocity speed range as quickly as possible and turn hard to generate maximum angles in the shortest time. Be aware that this is not always the optimum thing to do. However when you decide it’s time to command the highest rate, this is what you need to do. Turn Radius: The diameter in which an aircraft can turn a partial or complete circle at a given altitude and speed. The higher the speed the larger the radius, or circle, the aircraft will make in the sky. Conversely the slower the speed the smaller the radius. Turn radius determines the size of the turn circle. This radius is based on the aircrafts TAS and radial G. In a fight, the size of the circle and the relative turn rate capability of the two aircraft, will determine how well the pilot can solve the angular problems the defender presents. The objective is to work to where available G will allow the attacker to point his nose at the defender to achieve a missile or gun shot with an acceptable specific power (Ps) bleed-off. How well an aircraft can turn is a function of the turn rate and radius it generates. As already stated, Radius defines the size of an aircrafts turn or its turning circle. In the F-16, turn radius at max AOA/G is relatively constant over an airspeed range of 170 knots calibrated airspeed (KCAS) up to 330 KCAS. Above 330 KCAS, turn radius increases slightly as max G is obtained (440 KCAS). Above 440 KCAS, turn radius increases dramatically. The chart at left graphically depicts the effect of airspeed on radius. Note also how rate is affected. Understanding the concept of Turn Circles is another important principle for you to grasp in order to be a really effective BFM practitioner. Again, we’ll be going into this and many other things discussed in this lesson in greater detail later on in the course. For now concentrate on understanding how both radius and rate affect the fight. Knowing your adversaries capabilities in both these areas across his flight envelope and knowing your own in the Viper, or whatever other aircraft you are flying, will help you decide how best to approach employing BFM at different times in the fight. One thing to note here is that offensively, sustained operations are not possible in the same plane against a defender with a smaller turn circle (radius) assuming similar turn rates without inviting an overshoot/reversal situation. Alright. In plain English what this means is that if you run into a bandit that can turn in a tighter radius while maintaining a similar rate as you†¦. Things are gonna get really uncomfortable real quick if you continue a turn in the same plane with him. You need to use the vertical/get out of plane. That’s either vertical up or down and not necessarily 90 degrees for either. Depending on the situation a little either way may do. Corner Airspeed: Each aircraft has a specific speed at which it can turn at both the best rate and tightest radius. This is not to say the absolute best rate or the absolute tightest radius the aircraft is capable of, but rather the best combination of both. Because of the F-16 flight control system, the F-16 does not have a true corner velocity. It has a corner plateau which is an airspeed range of 330 440 KCAS that produces a good turn rate based on available G. In this chart you can see the â€Å"corner plateau† of the Viper. Note how both radius and rate stay fairly constant between 330 and 440 knots. Note also how rapidly radius increases and rate decreases above 440 as well as the decrease in rate below 330. As mentioned previously Radius stays fairly constant all the way from 170 to 330 knots or so. We’ve discussed turn rate radius as well as corner airspeed. Understanding how these factors play into the fight is key to your ability to not only survive but dominate your adversary. It’s more than just knowing your own aircrafts performance in these areas, it’s knowing the enemies as well. On top of that your ability to exploit this knowledge is what will make the difference in the end. As an example. F-4F’s from Holloman AFB’s 20th FTS routinely flew and won against F-15’s during the 114th FTS’s bi-annual Sentry Eagle Air to Air meet. The most interesting matches were the F-15 instructors vs. the F-4F instructors. Even though the F-15’s had the advantage in power, radius, instantaneous and sustained rate, the F-4’s were able to still come out on top. Why? Partly because the F-4 pilots had more experience and seat time. Many of the F-4 instructors had more than 3,000 hours in the F-4. Bottom line though is that they flew better BFM. They knew their jet and they knew their adversaries jet and it’s capabilities to a better level than their adversaries did. They used this knowledge to overcome the advantages of the enemy by taking advantage of their own aircrafts systems and flight characteristics. The moral of this story? Study and train hard. Know your jet inside and out and explore and become a expert at handling her. Know your enemy as well. Study of other aircraft and knowing what their performance actually translates to in the fight, will make the difference between killing or dying. Here’s another example. The F-18 has better nose pointing ability at lower speeds (below 240 knots down to 190) than the F-16. Nose pointing ability is rate G/AOA. Commonly referred to as Alpha in fighter pilot speak. Does this mean that the F-18 will always win in this speed range? Think about that question. What are the reasons you think so or not? We’ll use group discussion to answer it in depth. There’s way more to it than most people think.